Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts) empower courts to issue five principal writs:
Habeas Corpus (protection from illegal detention)
Mandamus (commanding public authorities to perform duties)
Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo-Warranto (reviewing authority actions)
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):
Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, holding while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its essential structure—including democracy, federalism, fundamental rights, and the rule of law Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):
Expanded Article 21 protections, linking Articles 14, 19, and 21 in what is known as the “golden triangle,” requiring that laws impinging on personal liberty must be just, fair, and reasonable Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1.
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):
Curbing misuse of Article 356 (President’s Rule), reinforcing judicial review in federal breakdowns and strengthening Centre–State separation of powers Wikipedia.
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975):
Continued affirmation of the Basic Structure Doctrine by striking down parts of the 39th Amendment infringing judicial power and electoral scrutiny Wikipedia.
Reviewing validity of laws and statutes under Articles 13, 32, and 226
Challenging legislative competence under Articles 245–246 and the Seventh Schedule (separation of Union/State powers) WikipediaReddit
Defending fundamental rights: equality, speech and expression, life & liberty, religious freedom, cultural rights, etc.
Defending constitutional remedies in cases such as arbitrary detention, misuse of executive power, or unlawful deprivation of rights
Representing clients in legal challenges to administrative and executive decisions
With deep litigation experience at constitutional levels, law firms like Legal Eye offer:
Strategic legal drafting of writ petitions, suomotu notices, and revision applications
Representation in High Court/Supreme Court for fundamental rights enforcement
Expertise in navigating landmark precedents, amendment validity, and separation-of-powers issues